- #Mac os framework vs library mac os x#
- #Mac os framework vs library software#
- #Mac os framework vs library code#
#Mac os framework vs library code#
In this way, your code will be called by the framework when appropriately. It defines a skeleton where the application defines its own features to fill out the skeleton. In framework, all the control flow is already there, and there are a bunch of predefined white spots that we should fill out with our code. For example, there are some libraries of mathematics which can let developer just call the function without redo the implementation of how an algorithm works. The classes or routines normally define specific operations in a domain specific area. get the code that has already been written by other developers. The reason behind is simply code reuse, i.e.
It is just a collection of routines (functional programming) or class definitions(object oriented programming). Some companies release just a normal library (in any sense of a classical library) and call it a "framework" because it sounds more fancy. It's just a hyped word, as I said before. In some way he rather explains how the term framework is used nowadays. I don't see how I need a "framework" for that. Really? I can have an object defined in a library, I can link against it, and sub-class it in my code. he says you need a framework for sub-classing. It's not wrong what he's saying there, however, he's just picking out one of the multiple definitions of framework and compares that to the classic definition of library. I personally think this article is highly arguable. Here's an article about some guy regarding the topic " Library vs.
#Mac os framework vs library software#
It can be a library, a collection of many libraries, a collection of scripts, or any piece of software you need to create your application. It is basically a file containing re-usable code that can usually be shared among multiple applications (you don't have to write the same code over and over again).Ī framework can be everything you use in application development.
It is a collection of objects/functions/methods (depending on your language) and your application "links" against it and thus can use the objects/functions/methods. So I'd say a library is just that, "a library". h files is pretty useless, unless you write them yourself according to some library documentation), instead of a bunch of files to move around (a Mac bundle is just a directory on the Unix level, but the UI treats it like a single file, pretty much like you have JAR files in Java and when you click it, you usually don't see what's inside, unless you explicitly select to show the content). Thus you have everything within a single package you need to use the library in your application (a C/C++/Objective-C library without. It can contain extra resources (images, localized strings, XML data files, UI objects, etc.) and unless the framework is released to public, it usually contains the necessary.
The difference between a bare library and the framework on Mac is that a framework can contain multiple different versions of the library. Within the bundle you will find an actual dynamic library (libWhatever.dylib).
#Mac os framework vs library mac os x#
Actually these terms can mean a lot of different things depending the context they are used.įor example, on Mac OS X frameworks are just libraries, packed into a bundle.
0 kommentar(er)
